pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Toronto <NToronto@Dentrix.com>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: vacuum
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 17:48:18 -0600
Message-ID: <14A4DCD7F3CED3118749009027DCBFE4A2C3F0@smtp.stsrvcs.com> (raw)

Maybe a good measure of how often the database needs to be vacuumed is how
often the administrators currently vacuum it?

For instance, if it's being vacuumed less than once a day, it may be
perfectly acceptable to vacuum it once early in the morning when nobody is
using it - assuming nobody uses it then, of course.

If the administrators have been using the product for a while, it may not be
too much of a problem to ask when the "slow times" are - you might be able
to just ask them.  We do electronic billing, and I've found that the people
who know the most about slow times and such are those people, and the Tech
Support Queen.

Just a couple of thoughts...
Neil

-----Original Message-----
From: Rainer Mager [mailto:rmager@vgkk.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 5:47 PM
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: [ADMIN] vacuum


Hi all,

	I'm sure many other people have faced this and I'm wondering what
solutions
were found.

	We have a product that uses PostgreSQL as its database. Currently,
via a
web-based administration interface, we provide the administrators the
ability to vacuum their database whenever they wish to. We would prefer to
provide this functionality automatically such that they don't need to think
about it.
	We could easily have the system vacuum once a day (or week or
whatever) but
we are concerned that the vacuum process will slow down the system while it
is being performed. This means that we would need to try to do some analysis
on the business of the system and then vacuum at a perceived slow time. This
sounds difficult.
	What do other people do? How much of a hit is vacuum when the system
is
operating? Any other ideas?


Thanks in advance,

--Rainer



view thread (33+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <14A4DCD7F3CED3118749009027DCBFE4A2C3F0@smtp.stsrvcs.com>
Permalink:  ../14A4DCD7F3CED3118749009027DCBFE4A2C3F0@smtp.stsrvcs.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/14A4DCD7F3CED3118749009027DCBFE4A2C3F0@smtp.stsrvcs.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: NToronto@Dentrix.com
  Subject: RE: vacuum
  In-Reply-To: <14A4DCD7F3CED3118749009027DCBFE4A2C3F0@smtp.stsrvcs.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox