pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Kenny Bachman <kenny.bachman17@gmail.com>
Cc: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: too high planning time
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:24:25 -0500
Message-ID: <1536295.1675351465@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC0w7LKjDd16T80CYejmMrht1Ddjcf1P8jg1POdH=RyRxCHLXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC0w7LKjDd16T80CYejmMrht1Ddjcf1P8jg1POdH=RyRxCHLXA@mail.gmail.com>

Kenny Bachman <kenny.bachman17@gmail.com> writes:
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE select
>     i."DefinitionId",
> from
>     "T_WF_INSTANCE" i
> where
>     i."InstanceId" = 10045683193;

>        QUERY PLAN

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Index Scan using
> "T_WF_INSTANCE_InstanceId_ApplicationCd_EntityStatusCd_idx" on
> "T_WF_INSTANCE" i  (cost=0.57..2.79 rows=1 width=34) (actual
> time=2.522..2.522 rows=1 loops=1)
>    Index Cond: ("InstanceId" = '10045683193'::bigint)

> * Planning Time: 8460.446 ms Execution Time: 2.616 ms*
> (4 rows)

It's hard to believe that such a simple query could take that
long to plan.  What I'm wondering is if the planner got blocked
on some other session's exclusive lock.  Not a lock on
"T_WF_INSTANCE" itself, because we'd have got that lock during
parsing before the "Planning Time" measurement starts.  But
there's going to be a physical access to the table's index
to determine its tree height, so an ex-lock on the index could
explain this.  Or an ex-lock on catalogs, particularly pg_statistic.
What else is going on in your database when this happens?

			regards, tom lane





view thread (4+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1536295.1675351465@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../1536295.1675351465@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1536295.1675351465@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, kenny.bachman17@gmail.com, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: too high planning time
  In-Reply-To: <1536295.1675351465@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox