From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Sabaini <peter.sabaini@ait.ac.at>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:09:12 -0400
Message-ID: <19082.1273003752@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273002081.2590.7.camel@w-ehs-psa.telbiomed.at>
References: <1272977816.21378.13.camel@w-ehs-psa.telbiomed.at>
<13335.1272987580@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<1273002081.2590.7.camel@w-ehs-psa.telbiomed.at>
Peter Sabaini <peter.sabaini@ait.ac.at> writes:
> On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd suggest backing off your ideas about how much filtering is
>> appropriate for local connections.
> Since we're running multiple database instances with different projects
> on one machine I'd like to isolate them as best I can.
Since the stats collector uses pre-bound UDP sockets, it should not be
possible for any interference to occur. If anything other than other
processes in the same PG herd is able to send a message on that socket,
it would be a kernel bug.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter.sabaini@ait.ac.at
Subject: Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?
In-Reply-To: <19082.1273003752@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox