From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@killerbytes.com>
To: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: benchmarking proposed config
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:12:09 -0700
Message-ID: <1E6E0384-D13F-419E-ABC9-7BC52B001A68@killerbytes.com> (raw)
Does anyone have suggestions for a utility that would easily let us mirror all queries to a "shadow" PG cluster, so that we can compare performance of our current production config against a new proposed config with our actual production traffic?
(We could live with the new one falling behind as long as queries were queued not lost--in fact we know this will happen.)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: scott_ribe@killerbytes.com
Subject: Re: benchmarking proposed config
In-Reply-To: <1E6E0384-D13F-419E-ABC9-7BC52B001A68@killerbytes.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox