From: Chris Hoover <revoohc@gmail.com>
To: Scott Mead <scottiebo@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Questions on pg_dump
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:58:20 -0400
Message-ID: <1d219a6f0807181358nca79789l2cc0bce9e3ab9a25@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <472b0db90807181136y6f0e38e3u618ad016721bc42d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <472b0db90807181136y6f0e38e3u618ad016721bc42d@mail.gmail.com>
We understand that. The question is why is an uncompressed Fc format so
much larger than a straight dump? Is the so bad it takes almost 5% extra
space?
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Scott Mead <scottiebo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Sorry I'm not responding to the list, I am not allowed to post from
> my corporate account, and this account is not subscribed to the admin
> list.
>
> -Z 0 means no compression. You'll want to stick with the default
> or -Z 9 for highest compression.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> --Scott
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: revoohc@gmail.com, scottiebo@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Questions on pg_dump
In-Reply-To: <1d219a6f0807181358nca79789l2cc0bce9e3ab9a25@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox