pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: markw@osdl.org
To: simon@2ndquadrant.com
Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
Cc: kn@mgnet.de
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <200407141555.i6EFtnk22984@mail.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1089760416.17493.3327.camel@stromboli>

On 14 Jul, Simon Riggs wrote:
> PITR Patch v5_1 just posted has Point in Time Recovery working....
> 
> Still some rough edges....but we really need some testers now to give
> this a try and let me know what you think.
> 
> Klaus Naumann and Mark Wong are the only [non-committers] to have tried
> to run the code (and let me know about it), so please have a look at
> [PATCHES] and try it out.
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Simon Riggs

Simon,

I just tried applying the v5_1 patch against the cvs tip today and got a
couple of rejections.  I'll copy the patch output here.  Let me know if
you want to see the reject files or anything else:

$ patch -p0 < ../../../pitr-v5_1.diff
patching file backend/access/nbtree/nbtsort.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 221.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file backend/access/nbtree/nbtsort.c.rej
patching file backend/access/transam/xlog.c
Hunk #11 FAILED at 1802.
Hunk #15 FAILED at 2152.
Hunk #16 FAILED at 2202.
Hunk #21 FAILED at 3450.
Hunk #23 FAILED at 3539.
Hunk #25 FAILED at 3582.
Hunk #26 FAILED at 3833.
Hunk #27 succeeded at 3883 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #28 FAILED at 4446.
Hunk #29 succeeded at 4470 with fuzz 2.
8 out of 29 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file backend/access/transam/xlog.c.rej
patching file backend/postmaster/Makefile
patching file backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1218 with fuzz 2 (offset 70 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1827 (offset 70 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1874 (offset 70 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1894 (offset 70 lines).
Hunk #7 FAILED at 1985.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 2039 (offset 70 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 2236 (offset 70 lines).
Hunk #10 succeeded at 2996 with fuzz 2 (offset 70 lines).
1 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file backend/postmaster/postmaster.c.rej
patching file backend/storage/smgr/md.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 162 with fuzz 2.
patching file backend/utils/misc/guc.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 342 (offset 9 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1387 (offset 9 lines).
patching file backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample
Hunk #1 succeeded at 113 (offset 10 lines).
patching file bin/initdb/initdb.c
patching file include/access/xlog.h
patching file include/storage/pmsignal.h




view thread (111+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200407141555.i6EFtnk22984@mail.osdl.org>
Permalink:  ../200407141555.i6EFtnk22984@mail.osdl.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200407141555.i6EFtnk22984@mail.osdl.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: markw@osdl.org, simon@2ndquadrant.com, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, kn@mgnet.de, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
  In-Reply-To: <200407141555.i6EFtnk22984@mail.osdl.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox