From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Pg/CyberCluster test results
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:17:09 -0400
Message-ID: <20080822151708.GE4131@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <767392.31997.qm@web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <767392.31997.qm@web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 06:33:50AM -0700, CG wrote:
> cluster, and I'm finidng that it is REALLY easy for the two
> back-ends to get out of sync with each other.
When I investigated that product, I came to the conclusion that it's
in the family of replication by query-dispatch. Everything in that
family has this problem, and it's a fundamental limitation of the
approach.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: ajs@commandprompt.com
Subject: Re: Pg/CyberCluster test results
In-Reply-To: <20080822151708.GE4131@commandprompt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox