From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Adam Radłowski <adamr@informatyka.gdansk.pl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: max_fsm_relations
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:17:31 -0300
Message-ID: <20081201131731.GB4459@alvh.no-ip.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4932EEF9.60603@informatyka.gdansk.pl>
References: <493225F2.1080307@informatyka.gdansk.pl>
<16624.1228067482@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<4932EEF9.60603@informatyka.gdansk.pl>
Adam Radłowski wrote:
> So, are You suggesting, that at the time of full database vacuuming,
> some of tables are not vacuumed, when "max_fsm_relations" is to small ?
No. They will all be vacuumed. The difference is that the space
reclaimed by vacuum will not be reused unless it is recorded by the FSM.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@commandprompt.com, adamr@informatyka.gdansk.pl, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: max_fsm_relations
In-Reply-To: <20081201131731.GB4459@alvh.no-ip.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox