pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:14:30 +0100
Message-ID: <200901260114.38476@zmi.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6d6637f0901251106s2e79467m1fe66b692a383508@mail.gmail.com>
References: <eb90f15e0901251047k6b8bacfm9fdf0d9e4aa9155a@mail.gmail.com>
	<d6d6637f0901251106s2e79467m1fe66b692a383508@mail.gmail.com>

On Sonntag 25 Januar 2009 Christopher Browne wrote:
> I did some benchmarking, now quite a while ago, which showed XFS to
> be, for a totally write-bound workload, a *few* percent better than
> ext3/JFS, but note that this is only a minor difference.

Remember that the structure of XFS consists of independent allocation 
groups. If your database is big enough to cross several AGs, it might 
increase performance by using several CPUs parallel, as an AG is 
independent of the others.

> The fact that XFS isn't one of the "more highly supported"
> filesystems on Linux is something I'd consider a *way* more important
> factor.

It looks like a very active project, see:
http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_Status_Updates
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/training/index.html

I read a lot about XFS during the last weeks, and tested it. So far, it 
was good, and we use it on a test server now with good performance and 
reliability (several power outages and kernel crashes happened, no data 
loss or anything).

But anyway, I guess the most performance can be gained by optimizing 
your postgresql.conf, and increasing memory and using a better RAID with 
faster and more 15k SAS disks. The filesystem is not that important for 
postgres.

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net                  Key-ID: 1C1209B4

Attachments:

  signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 196B) download

view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200901260114.38476@zmi.at>
Permalink:  ../200901260114.38476@zmi.at/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200901260114.38476@zmi.at

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at
  Subject: Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem
  In-Reply-To: <200901260114.38476@zmi.at>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox