pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan-Peter.Seifert@gmx.de
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: ashishka@synechron.com
Subject: Re: getting 'full' names of functions?
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:23:01 +0100
Message-ID: <20090305162301.81330@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6382.1236199119@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20090302122020.137490@gmx.net>
	<49ABE46D.3000501@synechron.com>
	<20090304173815.4090@gmx.net>
	<6382.1236199119@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Hello Tom,

> > I combined your suggestions into this query I'll be using for now:
> 
> > SELECT DISTINCT n.nspname || '.' || p.oid::regprocedure::text FROM
> 
> This is flat *wrong*, as you'll soon find if you are working with
> functions in more than one schema.  regprocedure already puts a
> schema qualification on the name if one is needed.

You are right. I was more concerned with getting the same number of functions as in pgAdmin III. There were two 'missing' because of pg_function_is_visible:

public.plpgsql_call_handler()
public.plpgsql_validator(oid)

They are obviously relicts from an earlier PostgreSQL-version. Could they cause problems if left be although the new versions are now in pg_catalog which obviously is being searched before all other schemata?

But why is regprocedure not just addding the schema to all of the functions then? 

Thank you very much,

Peter
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01



view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20090305162301.81330@gmx.net>
Permalink:  ../20090305162301.81330@gmx.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20090305162301.81330@gmx.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: Jan-Peter.Seifert@gmx.de, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, ashishka@synechron.com
  Subject: Re: getting 'full' names of functions?
  In-Reply-To: <20090305162301.81330@gmx.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox