pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)?
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:59:50 -0500
Message-ID: <20121107205950.GE26215@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP=oouG8VKubS78DSRBNXyY463VhtaQhu64kNRiHDQEMt1c0mA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP=oouFXfxbrvZ8FPq8QXSHJLcJtQ4i7RRjYeA_ow-OXTXvmQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121107184232.GB19163@momjian.us>
	<CAP=oouG8VKubS78DSRBNXyY463VhtaQhu64kNRiHDQEMt1c0mA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov  7, 2012 at 10:44:12AM -0800, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 02:44:05PM -0700, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >> I'm in the process of planning for a production upgrade from 9.1.6 to
> >> 9.2.x (all Linux-x86-64).  In my staging environment (which has the
> >> same versions), I kicked off pg_upgrade about 5 hours ago, and its
> >> still not done.  It is making progress, so I don't think anything has
> >> gone wrong, beyond it taking much longer than anticipated.
> >>
> >> When I used pg_upgrade to go from 9.0.x to 9.1.x, it finished in just
> >> under an hour.  There is admittedly about three times as much data (in
> >> terms of disk usage) now than when I upgraded from 9.0.x.  Would that
> >> explain the increased time needed to do the upgrade?  Or is there
> >> something about the upgrade to 9.2.x that requires a lot more time?
> >>
> >> I'm trying to understand if what I'm seeing is expected, normal
> >> behavior, or if something might not be right.
> >
> > Odd.  How many object/tables do you have?  I have just patched 9.2 to
> > improve upgrades for clusters with many objects.
> 
> about 5000 tables spread across 5 databases.

That should not take very long.  Are you using link mode?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +




view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20121107205950.GE26215@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../20121107205950.GE26215@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20121107205950.GE26215@momjian.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, netllama@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 takes a really long time (compared to previous versions)?
  In-Reply-To: <20121107205950.GE26215@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox