pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David F. Skoll <dfs@roaringpenguin.com>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: Scott Whitney <swhitney@journyx.com>
Subject: Re: Opinions on SSDs
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:18:17 -0400
Message-ID: <20130812141817.6377101d@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14817358.266767.1376323269109.JavaMail.root@mail.int.journyx.com>
References: <CAFwQ8rd7cg1QpuQnSdtcL0mJYuC9eDJ26wUzjWa4_NFJxD+R=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<14817358.266767.1376323269109.JavaMail.root@mail.int.journyx.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-admin>

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:01:09 -0500 (CDT)
Scott Whitney <scott@journyx.com> wrote:

> When you say "16 10K drives," do you mean:

I mean 8 RAID-1 pairs with data striped across the pairs.  The Linux
software RAID "offset" scheme is described here:

http://www.ilsistemista.net/index.php/linux-a-unix/35-linux-software-raid-10-layouts-performance-nea...

> The SSD solution I put in has shown significant speed improvements,
> to say the very least.

OK; thanks.

> Basically, just assume that you're getting 130 iops per drive. Well,
> 16 drives in a RAID 0 is going to max you out at 2100ish iops,

With our RAID-10 array, we're looking at about 1050 iops.  Our server
currently is holding up OK with a decidedly non-optimal arrangment
(four RAID-1 volumes with pg_xlog on one, most DB files on a second,
and a couple of tablespaces with hand-placed tables and indexes on the
other two, and only 7200 RPM disks.)

So I think 16 10Krpm spinning disks will probably suffice; the failure mode
of SSDs makes me nervous.

Regards,

David.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin



view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20130812141817.6377101d@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com>
Permalink:  ../20130812141817.6377101d@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20130812141817.6377101d@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: dfs@roaringpenguin.com, swhitney@journyx.com
  Subject: Re: Opinions on SSDs
  In-Reply-To: <20130812141817.6377101d@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox