pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Graeme B. Bell <grb@skogoglandskap.no>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: raid writethrough mode (WT), ssds and your DB. (was Performances issues with SSD volume ?)
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 19:20:59 -0400
Message-ID: <20150527232059.GA7962@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BA419F86-4BA4-4794-A2BE-BE3546F00F6A@skogoglandskap.no>
References: <E1YvH1i-00028l-Hq@malur.postgresql.org>
	<BA419F86-4BA4-4794-A2BE-BE3546F00F6A@skogoglandskap.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-admin>

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:21:49AM +0000, Graeme B. Bell wrote:
> > Not using your raid controllers write cache then?  Not sure just how
> > important that is with SSDs these days, but if you've got a BBU set
> > it to "WriteBack". Also change "Cache if Bad BBU" to "No Write Cache
> > if Bad BBU" if you do that.
>
> I did quite a few tests with WB and WT last year.
>
> - WT should be OK with e.g. Intel SSDs.  From memory I saw write
> performance gains of about 20-30% with Crucial M500/M550 writes on a
> Dell H710 RAID controller. BUT that controller didn't have WT fastpath
> though which is absolutely essential to see substantial gains WT. I
> expect with WT and a fastpath enabled RAID you'd see much higher
> numbers, e.g. 100%+ higher IOPS.
>
> (So, if you don't have fastpath on your controller, you might as
> well plan to leave WB on and just buy cheaper SSD drives rather than
> expensive ones - the raid controller will be your choke point for
> performance on WT and it's a source of risk).
>
> - WT with most SSDs will likely corrupt your postgres database the
> first time you lose power. (on all the drives I've tested)
>
> - WB is the only safe option unless you have done lots of plug pull
> tests on a drive that is guaranteed to protect data "in flight" during
> power loss (Intel disks + maybe the new samsung pcie).

I think you have WT (write-through) and WB (write-back) reversed above.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin



view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20150527232059.GA7962@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../20150527232059.GA7962@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20150527232059.GA7962@momjian.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, grb@skogoglandskap.no
  Subject: Re: raid writethrough mode (WT), ssds and your DB. (was Performances issues with SSD volume ?)
  In-Reply-To: <20150527232059.GA7962@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox