pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Campbell, Lance <lance@illinois.edu>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Partition tables in AWS RDS environment
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:31:18 -0400
Message-ID: <20170410143118.GK9812@tamriel.snowman.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B75CD08C73BD3543B97E4EF3964B7D7047B49034@CITESMBX1.ad.uillinois.edu>
References: <B75CD08C73BD3543B97E4EF3964B7D7047B47CF7@CITESMBX1.ad.uillinois.edu>
	<20170410135722.GI9812@tamriel.snowman.net>
	<B75CD08C73BD3543B97E4EF3964B7D7047B49034@CITESMBX1.ad.uillinois.edu>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-admin>

Greetings Lance,

* Campbell, Lance (lance@illinois.edu) wrote:
> In 9.6 if you do a pg_dump on a schema and you have a few very large tables in the schema will this cause the database to lock the table for writing?

In PG, readers do not block writers.

> This is an issue I ran into with older version of PostgreSQL using pg_dump on entire schemas.  To get around this issue I partitioned the really large tables so that the locking would be a much shorter time period while running pg_dump.  But this may not be necessary with 9.6

I'm not sure what issue you ran into, but pg_dump would block someone
from DROP'ing or TRUNACTE'ing a table (or other operations requiring a
very strong lock), not from simply doing an INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE
(which take a lower lock that doesn't conflict with the locks pg_dump
takes).

Information about the various locks in PG is available here:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/explicit-locking.html

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachments:

  signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 818B) download

view thread (5+ messages)

Message-ID: <20170410143118.GK9812@tamriel.snowman.net>
Permalink:  ../20170410143118.GK9812@tamriel.snowman.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20170410143118.GK9812@tamriel.snowman.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, lance@illinois.edu
  Subject: Re: Partition tables in AWS RDS environment
  In-Reply-To: <20170410143118.GK9812@tamriel.snowman.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox