pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: wambacher@posteo.de
Cc: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: tuple concurrently updated
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 12:00:45 -0300
Message-ID: <20180828150045.4jp4x2jvzod3ooik@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc354354-bf6a-622c-e045-d554c58d9b31@posteo.de>

On 2018-Aug-28, wambacher@posteo.de wrote:

> no, i respect your questions, but i can't answer them. because i don't
> know in detail what osm2pgsql is doing.
> 
> planet_osm_line it postgis

> >              Spalte              |            Typ            |
> > Sortierfolge | NULL erlaubt? | Vorgabewert
> > ---------------------------------+---------------------------+--------------+---------------+-------------

> >  way                             | geometry(LineString,4326)
> > |              |               |
> > Indexe:
> >     "idx_planet_osm_line_highway" btree (highway)
> >     "planet_osm_line_index" gist (way), Tablespace »planet3_is1«
> >     "planet_osm_line_pkey" btree (osm_id), Tablespace »planet3_is1«
> >     "planet_osm_line_tags_index" gin (tags), Tablespace »planet3_is1«
> > Tablespace: »planet3_ts1«

I bet that something is happening to the special Postgis catalog table
for the geometry type when you run this update.  Maybe, say, if you have
two such updates in a transaction, things break.  The innards of
geometry_in are, um, fascinating (though I can't tell for sure whether
it tries to modify anything).

Also, I wouldn't put my hands to the fire for the gist support for it.

I further bet you'd have more luck asking a Postgis mailing list rather
than pgsql-admin.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




view thread (28+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20180828150045.4jp4x2jvzod3ooik@alvherre.pgsql>
Permalink:  ../20180828150045.4jp4x2jvzod3ooik@alvherre.pgsql/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20180828150045.4jp4x2jvzod3ooik@alvherre.pgsql

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, wambacher@posteo.de, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: tuple concurrently updated
  In-Reply-To: <20180828150045.4jp4x2jvzod3ooik@alvherre.pgsql>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox