From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
To: Goti <aryan.goti@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 21:25:09 +0800
Message-ID: <20220206132509.4cmuhmonaxsmmg3o@jrouhaud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOzfMuoT9qhqEbKiYHVKzkGkmNmt9tx0e1VEE58nEUB13BAQXg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOzfMuoT9qhqEbKiYHVKzkGkmNmt9tx0e1VEE58nEUB13BAQXg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 05:24:37PM +0530, Goti wrote:
>
> Can someone shed some light as to whether aurora postgres uses wal buffers
> or not? Given the way the writes are handled differently, I would like to
> understand the same while it is being said in the documentation not to
> change the parameter from the default value of 16MB.
It's unlikely that any one here can answer the question. You should ask Amazon,
not us.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: rjuju123@gmail.com, aryan.goti@gmail.com, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?
In-Reply-To: <20220206132509.4cmuhmonaxsmmg3o@jrouhaud>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox