From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Silvio Brandani <silvio.brandani@tech.sdb.it>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: out of memory error
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:09:02 -0400
Message-ID: <23468.1283440142@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C7FBD34.2030607@tech.sdb.it>
References: <288793.40690.qm@web39707.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
<4C5BC43B.7050503@tech.sdb.it>
<4C5BF885.9060105@tech.sdb.it>
<4C7F9DA6.6080606@tech.sdb.it>
<4C7FA8B7.4000702@tech.sdb.it>
<22549.1283437674@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<4C7FBD34.2030607@tech.sdb.it>
Silvio Brandani <silvio.brandani@tech.sdb.it> writes:
> Tom Lane ha scritto:
>> Is it really the *exact* same query both ways, or are you doing
>> something like parameterizing the query in the application?
> Is it exactly the same, the query text is from the postgres log.
> I just try it in test environment and we have same situazione : psql it
> works, from application (odbc) do not.
Hm, there's got to be something different between the two cases.
Maybe the odbc application is issuing some SET commands that change
the chosen plan?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, silvio.brandani@tech.sdb.it
Subject: Re: out of memory error
In-Reply-To: <23468.1283440142@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox