From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu
Cc: mha@sollentuna.net
Cc: icub3d@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: could not read block
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:51:39 -0500
Message-ID: <29369.1132249899@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437C6BE802000025000007B7@gwmta.wicourts.gov>
References: <437C6BE802000025000007B7@gwmta.wicourts.gov>
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> None of this seems material, however. It's pretty clear that the
> problem was exhaustion of the Windows page pool.
> ...
> If we don't want to tell Windows users to make highly technical
> changes to the Windows registry in order to use PostgreSQL,
> it does seem wise to use retries, as has already been discussed
> on this thread.
Would a simple retry loop actually help? It's not clear to me how
persistent such a failure would be.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov, zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu, mha@sollentuna.net, icub3d@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: could not read block
In-Reply-To: <29369.1132249899@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox