pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: markw@osdl.org
Cc: kn@mgnet.de
Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:24:06 -0400
Message-ID: <29939.1090272246@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407192024.i6JKOrO16297@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200407192024.i6JKOrO16297@candle.pha.pa.us>

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> we need to check to see which one has a WAL eof-of-segment marker (we
> have on of those, right?).

No, we don't.

> I think I see a solution. We are going to create a file during backup so
> we know the wal offsets and xids.  If we see that file, we know either
> we have a restore of a backup or they currently running a backup.

... or the last backup attempt failed, but they forgot to remove the
file it left.  Or we are doing crash recovery after the system lost
power while a backup was running.  Or half a dozen other obvious scenarios.

> If we tell them not to restore while a backup is running (seems pretty
> obvious) we can then delete pg_xlog when the backup wal offset file
> exists.  In other cases, we know the WAL files are valid to use.

We're not deleting pg_xlog, period.  IMHO it's too dangerous even to
have such a function in the code.

My original suggestion was to *replace* individual xlog files with data
extracted from archive, and only after determining that the archive
indeed has a copy of that particular file (and we can fetch it).
This at least has a fighting chance of not losing information.  Wiping
pg_xlog in toto on the basis of a guess about the system status is just
a form of russian roulette.  Sooner or later you will wipe some xlog
files that you can't get back from archive.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (111+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <29939.1090272246@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../29939.1090272246@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/29939.1090272246@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, simon@2ndquadrant.com, markw@osdl.org, kn@mgnet.de, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
  In-Reply-To: <29939.1090272246@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox