From: Natalie Wenz <nataliewenz@ebureau.com>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and frozen xids
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 17:41:27 -0600
Message-ID: <2DB383E8-05A0-4532-9FCB-0B166B21AD6D@ebureau.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2-Wzn4xaMt+VR5NwH5Z0Nk34FEoyU1pFXOy=arV7LYmH4z-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C44C73BC-6B3A-42E0-9E44-6CE4E5B5D601@ebureau.com>
<CAH2-Wzn4xaMt+VR5NwH5Z0Nk34FEoyU1pFXOy=arV7LYmH4z-w@mail.gmail.com>
They are not, unfortunately (fortunately?). Just a standard table.
If it helps, the autovacuum always seems to be in the phase "cleaning up indexes" when I look at pg_stat_progress_vacuum.
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 5:25 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> Are the relations that autovacuum is
> processing materialized views?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: nataliewenz@ebureau.com, pg@bowt.ie
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and frozen xids
In-Reply-To: <2DB383E8-05A0-4532-9FCB-0B166B21AD6D@ebureau.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox