From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: LDAP authentication fails with more than one entry returned
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:04:58 +0300
Message-ID: <33c2a453-840d-10dc-2940-a6693f22414c@matrix.gatewaynet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ff6de141b5c42c8ac22863b9b308178@HE101867.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <3d5bf42743be4b789f4e70010a9259d8@HE101867.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
<d91be2b7-f747-6be9-0f26-a6717a2802f1@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
<6ff6de141b5c42c8ac22863b9b308178@HE101867.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-admin>
On 18/08/2017 12:19, Michael.Haertel@t-systems.com wrote:
>
> I found a solution for my use case although it is off-topic:
>
> I create the LDAP entries myself and I thought that it is common practice to create a copy of a user and paste it into a different sub-tree to grant additional privileges to the user. I now found
> that the LDAP objectClass “groupOfNames” can be used for that purpose. It contains an attribute “member” which is supposed to hold an entire DN as a reference to the user.
>
This is the standard use case.
> This way the uid attribute stays unique.
>
> *Von:*pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] *Im Auftrag von *Achilleas Mantzios
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 18. August 2017 08:41
> *An:* pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
> *Betreff:* Re: [ADMIN] LDAP authentication fails with more than one entry returned
>
> On 17/08/2017 18:07, Michael.Haertel@t-systems.com <mailto:Michael.Haertel@t-systems.com> wrote:
>
> As far as I understand you need to give the fully qualified DN to a user if you do simple binding. But in the pg_hba.conf I can only define a prefix that doesn’t change: “uid=”.
>
> But because all the users come from different trees the suffix depends on the sub-tree where the user has been added to. This part of the DN can’t be configured statically in the pg_hba.conf.
>
> Look at the DN for my example users in my play-instance of openLDAP:
>
> uid=mhaertel,cn=ftth,ou=Teams,dc=organization_gismobile,dc=ldap_db1,dc=mydomain,dc=com
>
> The part “cn=ftth,ou=Teams,dc=organization_gismobile” only is valid for a small subset of users and therefore I can’t define a full DN for the binding.
>
>
> Alright I see. Which raises the following question : When two entries with the same uid are found in different trees, then what are the semantics behind? Are those two users represented by those DNs
> supposed to be the same of different users?
> IMHO its not good practice to have the same uid representing different physical persons. If the physical users are different then you may simply change their uids to be unique across the whole tree,
> regardless of subtree.
> However, if the same uid is found in multiple subtrees and is indeed the same user then maybe some arrangement must be done in the LDAP server to somehow present one view of all users under a common
> dedicated base. In which case you'll prefer the simple bind mode again.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
> *Von:*pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org <mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org> [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] *Im Auftrag von *Achilleas Mantzios
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 17. August 2017 16:40
> *An:* pgsql-admin@postgresql.org <mailto:pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
> *Betreff:* Re: [ADMIN] LDAP authentication failes with more than one entry returned
>
> On 17/08/2017 16:58, Michael.Haertel@t-systems.com <mailto:Michael.Haertel@t-systems.com> wrote:
>
> Hello list,
>
> I configured postgreSQL to only allow users that are administered in LDAP to connect to one particular database on my PostgreSQL host. This works fine as long as only one entry is returned
> for the combination of “ldapbasedn” and “ldapsearchattribute”.
>
>
> Why don't you go the simple bind mode route? Just specify ldapprefix, ldapsuffix to construct your bind DN, this should by definition be unique.
>
>
>
> I currently match the LDAP attribute UID against the login name. Problem is that the users exist several times in the specified (sub-) directory tree. Everything works if the user only
> exists once within the specified “ldapbasedn”.
>
> How to deal with that problem?
>
> I think it is common practice to have several sub-trees, one per organizational unit for example. Within that OU there are several sub-trees that define privileges for SAMBA shares, database
> connections or other purposes. Because I need to search for the users across several OUs, I can’t give the path to only one sub-tree.
>
> I am currently on windows so I can’t test the ldapurl feature.
>
> Would it be possible to use the ldapurl directive to allow an ldapsearch across different 1^st level trees but only look for users within one particular sub-tree in each of the 1^st level trees?
>
> Thank you very much for your comments,
>
> Michael Härtel
>
> --
>
> Achilleas Mantzios
>
> IT DEV Lead
>
> IT DEPT
>
> Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
>
> --
> Achilleas Mantzios
> IT DEV Lead
> IT DEPT
> Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
--
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Subject: Re: LDAP authentication fails with more than one entry returned
In-Reply-To: <33c2a453-840d-10dc-2940-a6693f22414c@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox