From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_stat_database.xact_commit + pg_stat_database.xact_rollback as a reliable metric for xid consumption ?
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:48:33 +0300
Message-ID: <36dd7ae2-7c6f-86af-430b-dd9a0f7774b3@matrix.gatewaynet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOBaU_Zc5o=pKopyh=U02xw_FPN_ZWBhqe=-hSTPC-n7JF=X2g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51fa222b-374e-39da-eb8c-66d667426bae@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
<CAOBaU_Zc5o=pKopyh=U02xw_FPN_ZWBhqe=-hSTPC-n7JF=X2g@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/6/20 1:36 μ.μ., Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:02 PM Achilleas Mantzios
> <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> wrote:
> Because read only transaction usually don't consume an xid. So yes
> pg_stat_database gives a more reasonable approximation of the real
> number of transactions happening on the server.
Thank you, so what would be the official way to monitor txid consumption (from a MVCC / Freezing admin POV)?
>
>
--
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_stat_database.xact_commit + pg_stat_database.xact_rollback as a reliable metric for xid consumption ?
In-Reply-To: <36dd7ae2-7c6f-86af-430b-dd9a0f7774b3@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox