From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: More efficient pg_restore method?
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:48:48 -0500
Message-ID: <44555188-c787-b441-5c69-c56f72905bf4@gmail.com> (raw)
Pg 9.6.9 on Linux...
Given a backup server storing a "format=directory" database backup, and a
database server, should I:
Option #1: run pg_restore on the backup server and "push" the data to the
database server via port 5432, or
Option #2: have the backup server serve the dump directory via NFS, and run
pg_restore on the database server, pulling the data via nfs protocol?
(It'll be a multi-threaded restore over a 10Gb pipe.)
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: More efficient pg_restore method?
In-Reply-To: <44555188-c787-b441-5c69-c56f72905bf4@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox