From: Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>
To: Jonah H. Harris <jonah.harris@gmail.com>
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: David Tokmatchi <david.tokmatchi@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] Postgres VS Oracle
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:59:30 +0200
Message-ID: <4676C802.9090401@kostyrka.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36e682920706181038r21f88631w46960c28b42aeef8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c50dbb0b0706180855v4b781f13m6e54c50aa3ab1dee@mail.gmail.com>
<36e682920706180910y519bc6a5h11e0ba56f45009ec@mail.gmail.com>
<4676B7C7.6020801@kostyrka.org>
<36e682920706181002i495f3fc3s2d55472e36a91b63@mail.gmail.com>
<4676BE31.6040701@commandprompt.com>
<36e682920706181038r21f88631w46960c28b42aeef8@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>
> All of us have noticed the anti-MySQL bashing based on problems with
> MySQL 3.23... Berkus and others (including yourself, if I am correct),
> have corrected people on not making invalid comparisons against
> ancient versions. I'm only doing the same where Oracle, IBM, and
> Microsoft are concerned.
>
My, my, I fear my asbestos are trying to feel warm inside ;)
Well, there is not much MySQL bashing going around. And MySQL 5 has
enough "features" and current MySQL AB support for it is so "good", that
there is no need to bash MySQL based on V3 problems. MySQL5 is still a
joke, and one can quite safely predict the answers to tickets, with well
over 50% guess rate.
(Hint: I don't consider the answer: "Redo your schema" to be a
satisfactory answer. And philosophically, the query optimizer in MySQL
is near perfect. OTOH, considering the fact that many operations in
MySQL still have just one way to execute, it's easy to choose the
fastest plan, isn't it *g*)
Andreas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGdsgCHJdudm4KnO0RAg2oAKCdabTyQCcK8eC0+ErVJLlX59nNjgCfQjaO
hhfSxBoESyCU/mTQo3gbQRM=
=RqB7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: andreas@kostyrka.org, jonah.harris@gmail.com, jd@commandprompt.com, david.tokmatchi@gmail.com, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, pgsql-novice@postgresql.org, pgsql-general@postgresql.org, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] Postgres VS Oracle
In-Reply-To: <4676C802.9090401@kostyrka.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox