From: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
To: Silvio Brandani <silvio.brandani@tech.sdb.it>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PANIC killing vacuum process
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:43:00 -0500
Message-ID: <4CD3C3940200002500037336@gw.wicourts.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD403D8.10109@tech.sdb.it>
References: <4CD1886C.5000503@tech.sdb.it>
<AANLkTimbD1=QaH0C+eNJAd7w-Prr4n28qpuOyuRvQ0f2@mail.gmail.com>
<4CD15B26020000250003720C@gw.wicourts.gov>
<4CD2BC3E.7030004@tech.sdb.it>
<4CD403D8.10109@tech.sdb.it>
Silvio Brandani <silvio.brandani@tech.sdb.it> wrote:
> the postgres 9.0.x could be consider a stable version ?? or is
> better to wait 9.1 , in this case when will be released ??
You would gain nothing by waiting for 9.1. 9.0.x is no more or less
a stable version than 8.3.x. It's the "x" which means something
regarding release maturity. Since you had enough tolerance of
"early adopter" issues to have been using 8.3.1 until very recently,
you're probably OK with 9.0.1; but this time I would recommend
applying minor releases as they are published. Over time people
find odd little corner cases where there are problems, and the
release becomes more stable as the patches to fix them are applied.
-Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov, silvio.brandani@tech.sdb.it, scott.marlowe@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PANIC killing vacuum process
In-Reply-To: <4CD3C3940200002500037336@gw.wicourts.gov>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox