From: Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:20:16 -0800
Message-ID: <4CEAC270.6040608@emolecules.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3vd3p2o9l.fsf@jhcloos.com>
References: <1557390103.902044.1290397034758.JavaMail.root@sz0093a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>
<4788.1290402707@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<m3vd3p2o9l.fsf@jhcloos.com>
On 11/22/10 10:42 AM, James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>
> TL> It *is* configurable: make pg_xlog a symlink.
>
> I notice that everyone suggests using a symlink, but I never see anyone
> suggest just mounting a filesystem there.
>
> Is there a (technical) reason for that? Or is a symlink just though to
> be easier to explain?
I think it's a case of, "If you know how do do this, you don't have to ask."
Craig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: craig_james@emolecules.com
Subject: Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
In-Reply-To: <4CEAC270.6040608@emolecules.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox