From: Raymond O'Donnell <rod@iol.ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Can we Flush the Postgres Shared Memory ?
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 16:49:49 +0100
Message-ID: <4DC0241D.2050105@iol.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20710.1304435299@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <W3205622728228841304432218@webmail60>
<BANLkTim1v6buKhXFL72Q5UZbPd9RP74xAA@mail.gmail.com>
<20110503145430.GG2246@hermes.hilbert.loc>
<20710.1304435299@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 03/05/2011 16:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Karsten Hilbert<Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net> writes:
>> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:33:34PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> If you post here, the above disclaimer is not effective. Right now
>>> your words are being copied across the internet...
>
>> By typing / selecting a public list address "written consent
>> of the author" can be assumed to exist implicitely ;-)
>
> Nonetheless, corporate lawyers who insist on such disclaimers on all
> email are idiots, and make their company's employees look like idiots
> as well. Every disclaimer on obviously-public mail hastens the day
> when such disclaimers will have no legal force whatsoever (if indeed
> there's any left to them now).
I don't want to start a flame war, but did they every have any legal
force in the first place?
Ray.
--
Raymond O'Donnell :: Galway :: Ireland
rod@iol.ie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: rod@iol.ie, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Can we Flush the Postgres Shared Memory ?
In-Reply-To: <4DC0241D.2050105@iol.ie>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox