pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>
To: A J <s5aly@yahoo.com>
Cc: PG Admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: How frequently to defrag(cluster)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:04:59 -0700
Message-ID: <4E2742FB.40201@pinpointresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311191898.49250.YahooMailNeo@web120015.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <1311191898.49250.YahooMailNeo@web120015.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>

On 07/20/2011 12:58 PM, A J wrote:
> I understand that 'cluster' performs the role of defrag (along with 
> rewriting in index order) in Postgres.
> How frequently does one have to run cluster ? Any thumb-rules  or 
> experience ? How do I find if my table is fragmented enough to need a 
> cluster ?
> We are still to use Postgres in production, just evaluating at this point.
>
> Thanks for any pointers.
As with everything the answer is "it depends". For a "typical" workload 
where the rows updated by a single query are one or a few rowsl, the 
automatic vacuum process should handle everything for you without 
intervention (some tuning of the vacuum settings may be in order but it 
runs by itself).

When you update a row in PostgreSQL, the server inserts the "new" 
version of the row but also keeps the "old" row available until it is no 
longer visible to any running queries after which that space can be 
reclaimed. Locating reclaimable space and making it available for reuse 
is the job of the autovacuum process. If everything is tuned properly, 
PostgreSQL will keep refilling the "holes" in the table on its own.

There are some exceptions. A query that updates all rows in a table as 
might happen in some maintenance operations may increase the table-size 
more than you desire. This can be corrected using the cluster command.

Also, there are some workloads that have queries that grab chunks of 
data, say all records for a given date, where keeping the associated 
data physically close can improve performance.

If you are evaluating PG, you might want to post some info on the nature 
of the application. People are here because they like and use PostgreSQL 
but most are quite open about saying when it isn't an appropriate 
solution as well. You may also get tips on avoiding some common pitfalls 
that can prevent PostgreSQL from showing its full potential.

Cheers,
Steve

view thread (3+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4E2742FB.40201@pinpointresearch.com>
Permalink:  ../4E2742FB.40201@pinpointresearch.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4E2742FB.40201@pinpointresearch.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: scrawford@pinpointresearch.com, s5aly@yahoo.com
  Subject: Re: How frequently to defrag(cluster)
  In-Reply-To: <4E2742FB.40201@pinpointresearch.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox