From: Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
To: Lukasz Brodziak <lukasz.brodziak@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Sequence "self" change - possible?
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:37:54 +0800
Message-ID: <4ED44582.4080306@ringerc.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGWYGjVR6bwNpAwFRF-_NRP1fwFZCDWspyxLH58y--uW7ZPiHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGWYGjVR6bwNpAwFRF-_NRP1fwFZCDWspyxLH58y--uW7ZPiHA@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/28/2011 10:04 PM, Lukasz Brodziak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible for sequence to decrement its value by itself? Or is it
> possible to see wether it was changed by someone. The thing is that on
> one of our clinet's DB sequence rolled back to the state from 8 months ago.
It shouldn't generally be possible, no. It'd have to be changed by a
call to nextval(), setval() or the like, or a direct UPDATE to the
underlying sequence pseudo-table.
Could someone have tried to restore a backup from 8 months ago? That'd
result in a setval(...) call when pg_restore or psql (depending on
backup format) tried to set the sequence position.
In your case, though, your next post mentions possible database
corruption, so I'm wondering if this is related. If something's been
scribbling over the database files, someone's half-restored an old
file-level backup, or something similarly horrible then anything could
happen.
--
Craig Ringer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: ringerc@ringerc.id.au, lukasz.brodziak@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Sequence "self" change - possible?
In-Reply-To: <4ED44582.4080306@ringerc.id.au>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox