From: Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>
To: Bernhard Schrader <bernhard.schrader@innogames.de>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Big difference in databasesize compared with disksize
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:00:36 -0800
Message-ID: <4F3E95C4.1060102@pinpointresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3E246D.10900@innogames.de>
References: <4F3A6018.3000902@innogames.de>
<4F3E246D.10900@innogames.de>
On 02/17/2012 01:57 AM, Bernhard Schrader wrote:
> As result of no response i will try again and add some more
> information for you.
>
> The given problem is the same. I have many DB's which have for unknown
> reason, differences in Filesizes, if you check them with "du" or "ls",
> in their Filenodes.
Since you are getting different results from the OS tools (ls, du) on an
XFS system I'd check for info on XFS lists.
Googling "xfs du ls size difference" gives about 95,000 pages related to
this issue.
Cheers,
Steve
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: scrawford@pinpointresearch.com, bernhard.schrader@innogames.de
Subject: Re: Big difference in databasesize compared with disksize
In-Reply-To: <4F3E95C4.1060102@pinpointresearch.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox