From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Query on User account password change details
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 00:40:55 -0500
Message-ID: <4e87a433-531f-d108-4ef6-0c54ba44f587@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90B6B3A1-BB95-4D69-99EF-D86C0A859431@jakobs.com>
References: <CAPOO3u4cxoCmJsXJaMHCLavecb-Bc77=qh=dfQN+bbYJ6gneWA@mail.gmail.com>
<90B6B3A1-BB95-4D69-99EF-D86C0A859431@jakobs.com>
On 5/6/21 3:12 PM, Holger Jakobs wrote:
[snip]
> Actually, opposed to the opinion of people having lived under a stone for
> the last couple of years, it's absolutely not advisable to have a regular
> password changing scheme.
>
> These were in fashion in the 1990s and early 2000s
Comments like this are indicative of someone who's never been through an
external audit.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Query on User account password change details
In-Reply-To: <4e87a433-531f-d108-4ef6-0c54ba44f587@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox