pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rural Hunter <ruralhunter@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:40:06 +0800
Message-ID: <5053F896.60005@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120914183915.GA5933@momjian.us>
References: <5052C402.8020003@gmail.com>
	<20120914142616.GA11265@momjian.us>
	<50535302.8080000@gmail.com>
	<20120914183915.GA5933@momjian.us>

于 2012/9/15 2:39, Bruce Momjian 写道:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:53:38PM +0800, Rural Hunter wrote:
>>>> Performing Upgrade
>>>> ------------------
>>>> Analyzing all rows in the new cluster                       ok
>>>> Freezing all rows on the new cluster                        ok
>>>> Deleting files from new pg_clog                             ok
>>>> Copying old pg_clog to new server                           ok
>>>> Setting next transaction ID for new cluster                 ok
>>>> Resetting WAL archives                                      ok
>>>> Setting frozenxid counters in new cluster                   ok
>>>> Creating databases in the new cluster                       ok
>>>> Adding support functions to new cluster                     ok
>>>> Restoring database schema to new cluster                    ok
>>>> Removing support functions from new cluster                 ok
>>>> Copying user relation files
>>>>    /raid/pgsql/base/6087920/6088238
>>>> old and new databases "testdb" have a different number of relations
>>>> Failure, exiting
>>> That is an odd failure.  That check was added in PG 9.1 and this is the
>>> first time I am seeing this failure.
>>>
>>> The check is to make sure that once we have created all the user schema
>>> details in the new cluster, that there are the same number of objects in
>>> the new and old databases.
>>>
>>> Obviously there are a different number in your case here, but I don't
>>> know why those would be different, and in fact, because we have never
>>> hit this, there isn't even any debug output that shows the source of the
>>> difference.
>>>
>>> If I send you a patch can you compile it and send back the debug output
>>> it produces?
>>>
>> Yes sure, I will try to compile and retest with it.
> Actually, I have a simpler idea.  At the point where it fails, you can
> run pg_dump --schema-only on the testdb database in the old and new
> cluster and then diff those output files and email the result to us;  it
> should show the mismatch.  I am not sure if the dumps will output the
> objects in the same order, it might.
>
diff attached.

Attachments:

  schmdiff.zip (application/x-zip-compressed, 1.7K) download

view thread (49+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5053F896.60005@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../5053F896.60005@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5053F896.60005@gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: ruralhunter@gmail.com, bruce@momjian.us
  Subject: Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
  In-Reply-To: <5053F896.60005@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox