From: mike@trausch.us <mike@trausch.us>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Migration from Postgresql 9 to Oracle 10g
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:58:08 -0400
Message-ID: <50803520.4080103@trausch.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d1e9c61f635d9050a3ed284bff60be8@frank.uvena.de>
References: <CAM42borseyMiA0o4APWuo+08oWmOUpT1vNq8XzB0RFc_TAGpPQ@mail.gmail.com>
<28e7bf5060708a323543621f1fe1d80b@2ndquadrant.it>
<7d1e9c61f635d9050a3ed284bff60be8@frank.uvena.de>
On 10/18/2012 05:02 AM, frank@frank.uvena.de wrote:
> Am 2012-10-18 10:31, schrieb Gabriele Bartolini:
>
>> Just for the record and to understand if this is due to PostgreSQL
>> limitations, are you in a position to give us technical/product
>> reasons for this decision?
>
> I'd like to also know reasons for this....
I'll admit, I'm curious, too.
I've helped people move from all sorts of databases to PostgreSQL over
the years, and usually the major concerns are getting away from
proprietary/expensive/insecure/unsafe and/or discontinued systems,
Oracle included in that.
--- Mike
--
A man who reasons deliberately, manages it better after studying Logic
than he could before, if he is sincere about it and has common sense.
--- Carveth Read, “Logic”
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 725B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: mike@trausch.us
Subject: Re: Migration from Postgresql 9 to Oracle 10g
In-Reply-To: <50803520.4080103@trausch.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox