From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Ray Stell <stellr@vt.edu>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgresql-XC in production?
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:05:21 -0700
Message-ID: <51B212D1.1050902@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F86996F5-DA35-4F94-965E-4D2606C49458@vt.edu>
References: <F86996F5-DA35-4F94-965E-4D2606C49458@vt.edu>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-admin>
On 06/07/2013 09:37 AM, Ray Stell wrote:
>
> Is Postgresql-XC being used far-and-wide in production? It looks like an attractive path for a problem I'm considering, that problem being close to zero downtime with data replicated to all the datanodes. I suspect that is not the primary purpose of the effort, rather to partition across the nodes. Testimonials. TIA.
Ray,
The -xc list is probably a better place to ask. Far and Wide is a broad
term. I do know there are companies using it. It certainly doesn't have
the base that we do but it isn't as established either.
JD
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms
a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, stellr@vt.edu
Subject: Re: Postgresql-XC in production?
In-Reply-To: <51B212D1.1050902@commandprompt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox