From: John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Checkpoint_segments optimal value
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:04:08 -0700
Message-ID: <53CD8048.4010002@hogranch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405975881.98993.YahooMailNeo@web122303.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <CAOf_bQYehfKp7CNRa_pYQ+-SmHyDSYJ8bddbaixXUcWmSjH6wA@mail.gmail.com>
<1405975881.98993.YahooMailNeo@web122303.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-general>
On 7/21/2014 1:51 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> The above might help, but I think the biggest problem may be your
> VM. You show very low disk I/O numbers, but a pretty significant
> fraction of the time waiting for I/O. The previously-suggested
> iostat output may help nail it down more specifically, but
> basically you seem to have a big problem with bandwidth for storage
> access. It's pretty disturbing to see lines in vmstat output which
> show zero disk in or out, but over 10% of CPU time waiting for
> storage?!?
that would suggest to me a large number of VMs sharing a single SATA
drive, or similar.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: pierce@hogranch.com, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Checkpoint_segments optimal value
In-Reply-To: <53CD8048.4010002@hogranch.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox