From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bèrto ëd Sèra <berto.d.sera@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: stats and unix sockets
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:16:10 -0500
Message-ID: <6099.1324484170@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwGa_83=Vho7AmDRQSWJTx4TZ=ajePaOe-OHYLdiERLuNJJKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKwGa_83=Vho7AmDRQSWJTx4TZ=ajePaOe-OHYLdiERLuNJJKQ@mail.gmail.com>
=?UTF-8?B?QsOocnRvIMOrZCBTw6hyYQ==?= <berto.d.sera@gmail.com> writes:
> I have a requirement for PG (9.1) to run without any open port at all.
That's a pretty stupid requirement. The stats collector socket is bound
to itself, so it's inaccessible from anywhere else (on machine or off)
regardless of firewall settings. There's no need to worry about it,
and no there is not a provision for doing it via unix socket instead.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, berto.d.sera@gmail.com
Subject: Re: stats and unix sockets
In-Reply-To: <6099.1324484170@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox