From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: Dirk Krautschick <Dirk.Krautschick@trivadis.com>
To: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum behaviour for replicated nodes with pglogical (postgres 10)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:59:13 +0200
Message-ID: <64c95ef1-925b-adc1-10b7-32cbf27c9432@enterprisedb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZRAP278MB0254E1B58BE392B3C6B40FA3E9199@ZRAP278MB0254.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <ZRAP278MB0254E1B58BE392B3C6B40FA3E9199@ZRAP278MB0254.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On 24.03.22 09:39, Dirk Krautschick wrote:
> should I expect the same vacuum behaviour on both nodes replicated with
> pglogical
>
> if both nodes have the very same autovacuum settings?
>
> The insert, update, delete do have the same affect on the threshold on
> standby side, right?
Yes, it should roughly be the same.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com, Dirk.Krautschick@trivadis.com
Subject: Re: Vacuum behaviour for replicated nodes with pglogical (postgres 10)
In-Reply-To: <64c95ef1-925b-adc1-10b7-32cbf27c9432@enterprisedb.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox