From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
To: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: richard coleman <rcoleman.ascentgl@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 09:50:54 -0600
Message-ID: <6EF026A5-5CEC-48AB-B27E-C225DAE6E10A@elevated-dev.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKFQuwaEckQ5T10RwLsAx5giGtz9B4RsJg=U6WbZBTGAPmKSBA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGA3vBugp4Ce8ZbOfntb8HjCvo5QtX1hhAHj3iuCMZdzSTo4dg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwaEckQ5T10RwLsAx5giGtz9B4RsJg=U6WbZBTGAPmKSBA@mail.gmail.com>
> On May 1, 2023, at 9:25 AM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The arguments about "the Unix way" seem to have forgotten the point about being silent except in cases of exception, and this level of detail already violates that premise.
It would be a reasonable convenience. I think some of the pushback is from the framing that not having it is a defect.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com, david.g.johnston@gmail.com, rcoleman.ascentgl@gmail.com, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion
In-Reply-To: <6EF026A5-5CEC-48AB-B27E-C225DAE6E10A@elevated-dev.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox