pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 00:54:13 -0400
Message-ID: <8886.1090212853@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407190314.i6J3EAJ07392@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200407190314.i6J3EAJ07392@candle.pha.pa.us>

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> What is the process of logging to tape?  Ideally we could just do 'dd'
> to the tape drive in append mode;  however we need a way of signalling
> that we want to change tapes.

The reason we use a user-specifiable shell command for archiving is
so that we do not have to answer the above ;-).  It's the user's problem
to write a shell script that does things the way he wants.  He can make
it connect to /dev/tty and ask the operator to swap tapes, or whatever.

Personally I am very accustomed to Hewlett-Packard's disk-to-tape backup
program "fbackup", which allows you to provide a shell script to handle
exactly this sort of thing, and it's worked well for me for many years.

> I am asking to make sure we don't need a PITR pause mode that prevents
> WAL files from being archived but also prevents them from being
> recycled.

WAL files will not be recycled until the archiver daemon has set a .done
flag file for them, so I see no problem here.  (Note: I took out some
code in Simon's original patch that would start bleating on the basis
of totally unsupportable assumptions about long archival of a log
segment "ought to" take.)

			regards, tom lane



view thread (111+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <8886.1090212853@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../8886.1090212853@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/8886.1090212853@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, simon@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
  In-Reply-To: <8886.1090212853@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox