From: Thomas Kellerer <shammat@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Logical replication alternative
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:58:33 +0100
Message-ID: <998fc693-ca58-ae60-b082-45de80a78b19@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALhHtcAhgLkN0SM6iZqG0S5OZw6_Q-3YaBrtrBMNwiWzF3YM0A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALhHtcAhgLkN0SM6iZqG0S5OZw6_Q-3YaBrtrBMNwiWzF3YM0A@mail.gmail.com>
Yambu schrieb am 04.11.2020 um 11:55:
> May i know what is the alternative to logical replication if i want
> to replicate a few tables on postgres v10?
What about using foreign tables?
Then no replication would be required.
If that is to slow, you could create a materialized view on the
"secondary" server that is based on the foreign tables.
You can refresh the MVIEW multiple times a day.
The downside is that this isn't incremental, you would always copy
all the data.
Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: shammat@gmx.net, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Logical replication alternative
In-Reply-To: <998fc693-ca58-ae60-b082-45de80a78b19@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox