pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
Cc: mangoo <mangoo@wpkg.org>
Cc: scott.marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin.Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgpool versus sequences
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:42:37 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTimUw2BP4SQjHTLfOv-ojT5EyU6DnQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14930.1307025118@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <26909.1306965898@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<BANLkTikCRTeZ_g-rDay4RukWOY3Q7irCnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<27741.1306968830@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20110602.080816.460114267356667394.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
	<1306971997-sup-5549@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<BANLkTimgVA7mi2SP_ZVH-fsUB3VShTsMng@mail.gmail.com>
	<14930.1307025118@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>> Yeah -- why is LOCK SEQUENCE foo_seq not allowed?  Seems a simple thing
>>> to have.
>
>> It cause a grammar conflict.
>
> That's a lot of work for a purely cosmetic issue, though.  What would be
> trivial is to let this work:
>
> regression=# create sequence s1;
> CREATE SEQUENCE
> regression=# begin;
> BEGIN
> regression=# lock table s1;
> ERROR:  "s1" is not a table
>
> We should do that anyway, even if we put in the effort to support the
> other syntax.

Ugh.  We are already stuck supporting all kinds of backward
compatibility cruft in tablecmds.c as a result of the fact that you
used to have to use ALTER TABLE to operate on views and sequences.
The whole thing is confusing and a mess.  -1 from me on extending that
mess to more places.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



view thread (20+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <BANLkTimUw2BP4SQjHTLfOv-ojT5EyU6DnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../BANLkTimUw2BP4SQjHTLfOv-ojT5EyU6DnQ@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/BANLkTimUw2BP4SQjHTLfOv-ojT5EyU6DnQ@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: robertmhaas@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@commandprompt.com, ishii@postgresql.org, mangoo@wpkg.org, scott.marlowe@gmail.com, kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: pgpool versus sequences
  In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimUw2BP4SQjHTLfOv-ojT5EyU6DnQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox