From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Imre Oolberg <imre@auul.pri.ee>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Re: pg v. 8.4.5 misses objects and data after restoring from backup using wal
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:49:37 -0700
Message-ID: <E486B5B1-EC5F-4615-8633-D89CF6665663@elevated-dev.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22500.1294080152@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <AANLkTikY_XJ0Ok7bLGVxXXfGgenfnzJ4RnSiM_H40FCM@mail.gmail.com>
<4D2213EB.7090700@auul.pri.ee>
<42066935-6D27-46E3-8094-836D204816B7@elevated-dev.com>
<22500.1294080152@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Jan 3, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> That's either incorrect or poorly worded.
Let's go with poorly worded then. (Actually I don't do this, I use streaming replication, where I don't have to copy the WAL files because the standby picks up the ones that are needed.)
Unless I misread his earlier post, he is starting the backup, copying files, stopping the backup, and expecting those transactions (between start & stop) to be applied, even though files changed during that time (including WAL files) have not all been copied. Again, unless I misread his earlier post, he is *not* copying WAL that was generated between start & stop.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, imre@auul.pri.ee
Subject: Re: Re: pg v. 8.4.5 misses objects and data after restoring from backup using wal
In-Reply-To: <E486B5B1-EC5F-4615-8633-D89CF6665663@elevated-dev.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox