pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru>
To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Cc: Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Large number of partitions of a table
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:27:33 +0000
Message-ID: <YefnlQRGBnWj4YbF@admin.sibptus.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d45899c8-187d-4a1d-563b-f5842243e770@gmail.com>
References: <YeTYA63gEXNePfkv@admin.sibptus.ru>
	<3919502.1642393668@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<YeUAx56Juri43xGY@admin.sibptus.ru>
	<671340a5-1960-e5dc-1d09-4b7f36cda2c8@gmail.com>
	<YeYr88f3jXHlijU9@admin.sibptus.ru>
	<254601.1642480213@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<YeZV0QSOly8Pnx5d@admin.sibptus.ru>
	<268771.1642489687@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<YeZ3/4TSd+xHAlDl@admin.sibptus.ru>
	<d45899c8-187d-4a1d-563b-f5842243e770@gmail.com>

Ron wrote:

[dd]

> >
> > What about the system catalogs however? Will the extra 10000
> > tables and 500000 indexes negatively impact the performance of the
> > system catalogs? Are there any caveats you could think of?
> 
> EXPLAIN plans are going to be hilariously gigantic, which means that query 
> planning would take a loooong time,  

No, I'm not observing this for my test queries. With
enable_partition_pruning=on (which is the default) all the queries
I've tested look neat and short.

> And the query planner (in v12, at 
> least) can generate some pretty bad plans in partitioned tables; I bet there 
> are edge cases in the QP code that don't work well with 10000 partitions and 
> 50000 indices.

Actually "5.11.6. Best Practices for Declarative Partitioning" says
"The query planner is generally able to handle partition hierarchies
with up to a few thousand partitions fairly well, provided that
typical queries allow the query planner to prune all but a small
number of partitions."

I admit 10000 partitions is slightly more than "a few thousand". "A
few" sounds to me like 3-5.

-- 
Victor Sudakov VAS4-RIPE
http://vas.tomsk.ru/
2:5005/49@fidonet





view thread (22+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <YefnlQRGBnWj4YbF@admin.sibptus.ru>
Permalink:  ../YefnlQRGBnWj4YbF@admin.sibptus.ru/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/YefnlQRGBnWj4YbF@admin.sibptus.ru

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: vas@sibptus.ru, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org, ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Large number of partitions of a table
  In-Reply-To: <YefnlQRGBnWj4YbF@admin.sibptus.ru>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox