From: pgsql-admin@kolttonen.fi
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: The current shape of PG master-slave replication
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 07:03:45 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1811160701360.25223@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANUg7LCwCiaSDcpvrQdCCuLwt7ro1K2Qg8utgh7JziiM+1dacw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1811152002490.16940@localhost>
<CANUg7LCwCiaSDcpvrQdCCuLwt7ro1K2Qg8utgh7JziiM+1dacw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, Payal Singh wrote:
> It is more reliable than default MySQL replication. Default MySQL
> replication is logical whereas default postgres replication is binary. In
> the crudest of terms, if something goes wrong you can't just 'skip'
> statements in postgres to get replication to work like you can in MySQL.
> This ensures better data integrity during replication. As for non-defaults,
> pg10 and onwards support logical replication as well, with the usual
> caveats that logical replication comes with in any database.
I see. Thanks for that explanation.
I really have to study these DB things a bit more in order to gain better
understanding of replication's basic models and structure.
Best regards,
Unto Sten
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-admin@kolttonen.fi
Subject: Re: The current shape of PG master-slave replication
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1811160701360.25223@localhost>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox