pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Holger Jakobs <holger@jakobs.com>
To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: what is the best way to access cold data on another server?
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 09:24:41 +0200
Message-ID: <b207fb8a-7c2e-c21a-5786-361a31e71866@jakobs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADTdw-yP_n1zDWPzNhBMe4z2siSoeU9rX4M7DLZCbtJfs1ThDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADTdw-yP_n1zDWPzNhBMe4z2siSoeU9rX4M7DLZCbtJfs1ThDQ@mail.gmail.com>

dblink is outdated, postgres_fdw is current.

Am 13.05.20 um 09:12 schrieb Amine Tengilimoglu:
> Hello everyone;
>
>     In addition to the actively used data, there are other data that
> are very little accessed. I want to separate the less used data to
> save space and reduce maintenance operations. I want to use a separate
> postgres instance for this. Now the question is; How do I link these
> two instances? postgres_fdw or dblink? or what other solution? Which
> one would be better?
>
>
>
> thanks in advance..

-- 
Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach, Tel. +49-178-9759012






view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <b207fb8a-7c2e-c21a-5786-361a31e71866@jakobs.com>
Permalink:  ../b207fb8a-7c2e-c21a-5786-361a31e71866@jakobs.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/b207fb8a-7c2e-c21a-5786-361a31e71866@jakobs.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: holger@jakobs.com, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: what is the best way to access cold data on another server?
  In-Reply-To: <b207fb8a-7c2e-c21a-5786-361a31e71866@jakobs.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox