pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Diogenes Caraballo <diogns@gmail.com>
To: Tena Sakai <tsakai@gallo.ucsf.edu>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: vacuuming and reindexing
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:31:49 -0400
Message-ID: <c82353130903210631x71e1e8a0u65d2684ce2d48292@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FE44E0D7EAD2ED4BB2165071DB8E328C04E84A32@egcrc-ex01.egcrc.org>
References: <FE44E0D7EAD2ED4BB2165071DB8E328C04E84A32@egcrc-ex01.egcrc.org>

do you also update rows of that table?

because that action delete old one's and insert new one's..

if you are just inserting rows and not updating or deleting, i think is
correct your point.


Regards,
--
"Sin desafíos la vida es una rutina, una lenta agonía"

     Diógenes Caraballo


On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 18:03, Tena Sakai <tsakai@gallo.ucsf.edu> wrote:

>  Hi Everybody,
>
> I have a table that I add rows every evening.
> A rule I have for this table is that no row
> ever gets deleted.  It has 600+ million rows.
>
> The last time I did it, it took nearly 4 hours
> to vacuum and 13 hours 40 minutes to reindex.
>
> My rudimental understanding of vacuuming is
> that when the rows get "deleted" it is only
> marked as "deleted" but the data is left alone
> until the act of vacuuming takes place.  The
> vacuuming really gets rid of rows and pushes
> the data in such the way there is no "hole."
> And therefore after vacuuming, it is necessary
> to reindex (and analyze) the table.
>
> Is this a correct understanding?
>
> If it is (and as new rows get added new indexes
> are also built for the new rows), the fact that
> there is no deletion means there is no necessity
> for vacuuming this particular table?
>
> I appreciate any thoughts on this matter.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tena Sakai
> tsakai@gallo.ucsf.edu
>
>
>
>

view thread (3+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <c82353130903210631x71e1e8a0u65d2684ce2d48292@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../c82353130903210631x71e1e8a0u65d2684ce2d48292@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/c82353130903210631x71e1e8a0u65d2684ce2d48292@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: diogns@gmail.com, tsakai@gallo.ucsf.edu
  Subject: Re: vacuuming and reindexing
  In-Reply-To: <c82353130903210631x71e1e8a0u65d2684ce2d48292@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox