From: William Sescu (Suva) <william.sescu@suva.ch>
To: 'David G. Johnston' <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: AW: REINDEX VERBOSE DATABASE not working
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 06:15:25 +0000
Message-ID: <cb2c70cf3ffc40d3a9e89e4041559215@suva.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKFQuwbYdVU5gKT1Rs5=qEo81wcXJXsceaROyUdpxxpjf6gu7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <da27115b57ec4109b68a5825f34df790@suva.ch>
<CAPfkCSB5wWjh5uabEj-uH8+km_wggLBYid9KE3UdSTeTRV0gsg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFpscORRnDKc+OZzPhPwHDLCve7Z23w2S48BeCztnbbKU5-WPw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwb2A_1LotRwexbb4r6CGCj3mPYAMvEXJBtrW-WMb9czxg@mail.gmail.com>
<a007fd9297c349e4896166cd5d447e81@suva.ch>
<CAKFQuwbYdVU5gKT1Rs5=qEo81wcXJXsceaROyUdpxxpjf6gu7A@mail.gmail.com>
Hello David
Yes, I did read the thread. However, I still don’t see the advantage of running:
REINDEX ( VERBOSE ) DATABASE xxx;
Instead of:
REINDEX VERBOSE DATABASE xxx;
And coming back to the TAB completion thing, which is a fantastic feature, by the way, does not show you the option
which comes in parentheses. I don’t know if this is by design or not.
>REINDEX [TAB] [TAB]
DATABASE INDEX SCHEMA SYSTEM TABLE
I would expect with the current syntax implementation:
>REINDEX [TAB] [TAB]
(VERBOSE) DATABASE INDEX SCHEMA SYSTEM TABLE
Nevertheless, thanks everyone.
I think I will switch to the command line tool reindexdb. ;-) This one is more intuitive from my point of view:
reindexdb --verbose --dbname=xxx
Cheers,
William
Von: David G. Johnston [mailto:david.g.johnston@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Juli 2019 22:33
An: Sescu William (SW0) <william.sescu@suva.ch>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Betreff: REINDEX VERBOSE DATABASE not working
On Wednesday, July 3, 2019, William Sescu (Suva) <william.sescu@suva.ch<mailto:william.sescu@suva.ch>> wrote:
Thanks for clarification. The REINDEX (VERBOSE) DATABASE xxx; works.
However, the syntax is not intuitive, from my point of view.
Would it not be possible to allow 2 options. One with (VERBOSE) for backward compatibility and one with VERBOSE
Its possible but such a patch would never be committed (did you read the email thread?). Intuitiveness isn’t a huge concern here. Especially for a command that isn’t intended to be run manually often.
The learning curve for PostgreSQL includes knowing where to find command syntax and how to read it. Its a complex language that is constantly being added to.
David J.
________________________________
Disclaimer:
Diese Nachricht und ihr eventuell angehängte Dateien sind nur für den Adressaten bestimmt. Sie kann vertrauliche oder gesetzlich geschützte Daten oder Informationen beinhalten. Falls Sie diese Nachricht irrtümlich erreicht hat, bitten wir Sie höflich, diese unter Ausschluss jeglicher Reproduktion zu löschen und die absendende Person zu benachrichtigen. Danke für Ihre Hilfe.
This message and any attached files are for the sole use of the recipient named above. It may contain confidential or legally protected data or information. If you have received this message in error, please delete it without making any copies whatsoever and notify the sender. Thank you for your assistance.
Attachments:
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 5.3K) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: william.sescu@suva.ch, david.g.johnston@gmail.com
Subject: Re: AW: REINDEX VERBOSE DATABASE not working
In-Reply-To: <cb2c70cf3ffc40d3a9e89e4041559215@suva.ch>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox