From: MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA@sqlexec.com>
To: Ken Benson <Ken@infowerks.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg_logical - for PG 9.59 running on windows server
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:18:38 -0500
Message-ID: <cb578a17-c0fc-6a44-9d55-2953f49d8d94@sqlexec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR19MB009681980029F05EF145B6B5A3040@MWHPR19MB0096.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MWHPR19MB009681980029F05EF145B6B5A3040@MWHPR19MB0096.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Ken,
On a side issue of upgrading to PG V11, why not PG V12? It already has
one minor upgrade applied to it, 12.1.
Regards,
Michael Vitale
Ken Benson wrote on 1/30/2020 10:09 AM:
>
> Does anyone have a compiled version of the pg_logical module/package
> for Windows Server, PostgreSQL version 9.5.9?
> We have not been able to get a clean compile.
>
> We have a fairly large database (1.29 TB raw size of the data cluster)
> running on Windows Server, PosgreSQL 9.5.9
>
> We have created a new Linux server (11.4) – and are looking for the
> least-down-time method to get that database migrated from
> Windows/9.5.9 to Linux/11.4
>
> Is pg_logical a viable alternative?
>
> If so – how do I get a compiled version for my ‘source’ server.
>
> Ken Benson | ken @ infowerks-dot-com
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: MichaelDBA@sqlexec.com, Ken@infowerks.com, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_logical - for PG 9.59 running on windows server
In-Reply-To: <cb578a17-c0fc-6a44-9d55-2953f49d8d94@sqlexec.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox