From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Roger Ging <rging@musicreports.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Vacuum wait time problem
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:15:02 -0700
Message-ID: <dcc563d10902131415v352eecc3v8f64d8d64570f9c5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4995EC90.5020200@musicreports.com>
References: <4995ABC0.4090401@musicreports.com>
<dcc563d10902131321h548104a0vdf3d16f0dc27f015@mail.gmail.com>
<4995EC90.5020200@musicreports.com>
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Roger Ging <rging@musicreports.com> wrote:
Oh yeah, also, any chance of testing your RAID array in RAID-10 some
day? RAID5 anything tends to be pretty slow at writes, especially
random ones, and RAID-10 may give you a lot more bandwidth where you
need it, on the write side of the equation.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: scott.marlowe@gmail.com, rging@musicreports.com
Subject: Re: Vacuum wait time problem
In-Reply-To: <dcc563d10902131415v352eecc3v8f64d8d64570f9c5@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox