From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Rafael Domiciano <rafael.domiciano@gmail.com>
Cc: Jessica Richard <rjessil@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: vacuum full...
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:11:37 -0700
Message-ID: <dcc563d10902191211g73932526l468d9b8bd1c356ad@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a0028490902191001i2057a5ebs1e77b0f8ebf556bb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <255907.92456.qm@web111313.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
<dcc563d10902190837r3a528793p29b6e2245ce99208@mail.gmail.com>
<3a0028490902191001i2057a5ebs1e77b0f8ebf556bb@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Rafael Domiciano
<rafael.domiciano@gmail.com> wrote:
> I used to run vacuum full in one of my bases, but now i'm not running
> anymore vacuum full, just vacuum analyze in the past 1 month, but the number
> of necessary pages is increasing every day, now it's in 311264... there is
> any problem this get increasing?
> When I runned Reindex few days ago, this number get not decreased.
> I now that vacuum full reorders the relation, but it's the only thing that
> it does?
Same question I had for the other poster, why are you not running
autovacuum? Has it proven itself not up to the task?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: scott.marlowe@gmail.com, rafael.domiciano@gmail.com, rjessil@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: vacuum full...
In-Reply-To: <dcc563d10902191211g73932526l468d9b8bd1c356ad@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox